|
''Wrenn v. Boy Scouts of America'', case no. C03-04057 JSW, was a case before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Wrenn asked for the cancellation of federal trademark registrations of the Boy Scouts of America. ==Background== Cub Scouting is a program of the Boy Scouts of America for boys under the age of 11. The daughter of Gregory J. Wrenn was denied admission to the Cub Scout pack where her twin brother was registered. Wrenn founded the National Council of Youthscouts in 2002 as a "non-discriminatory Scouting organization" and in July 2003 filed for the trademark of "Youthscouts" with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In July 2003, the BSA filed a notice of opposition with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) against Wrenn, claiming that the registration and continued use of the term "Youthscouts" would "cause confusion, deception, mistake, and misrepresentation" regarding the name's source or sponsorship, and would cause injury and damage to the BSA. Their grounds for opposition included an allegation that the word "Scout" is recognized by Americans as being connected with the BSA and points out that some dictionaries' definition of "Scout" includes "a member of the Boy Scouts." The BSA also noted that in addition to standard trademark protection, marks were protected by the congressional charter granted in 1916 under 36 U.S.C. Chapter 309.〔 Federal charter, Boy Scouts of America〕 In November 2005, Wrenn filed two notices of opposition with the TTAB claiming that the BSA's uses of "Scout Gear" and "Scout Zone" were invalid and alleging that the BSA had "committed fraud on the Trade Mark office and trademark misuse." In February 2006, TTAB consolidated the three cases. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Wrenn v. Boy Scouts of America」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|